DUNIN7 · LOOMWORKS · RECORD
record.dunin7.com
Status Current
Path session-handoffs/loomworks-session-handoff-2026-06-25-v0_1.html

DUNIN7 · Loomworks · Session Handoff

Companion surface design + engagement identity + Bin-3 build queue

Version. v0.1
Date. 2026-06-25 (evening)
For. The next chat, starting cold in the morning.
Two-role discipline. Claude.ai = scoping, CRs, methodology, records, design. CC (on DUNIN7-M4) = execution, retrieval, commits, pushes. Every repo write needs Operator authorization before commit AND before push (halt-before-push). Stage by explicit path. Fresh chat per work type. Records HTML+MD, home loomworks-record; CC drops record copies in ~/Downloads/ as the bridge.

Read this first

This session designed the Companion as a conversational driver over the Loomworks engine, took a deep detour to settle engagement identity (which was blocking the design), then produced a grounded engine-work queue. Everything substantive is filed in loomworks-record. The design phase is essentially complete; the next phase is build scoping.

The single most important next action: scope the current-engagement spine (queue item B) — a current_engagement_id field on host_account. It is the structural keystone the voice-first Companion rests on. A fresh-chat scoping note, grounded by the Bin-3 findings record. (TTS / item A is an independent near-free frontend piece, scopable in parallel.)

How the session got here (the arc)

Started from "I did not notice any changes to the Companion interface" and the Companion feeling useless. Through the Operator repeatedly refusing the smaller question, it became: design the best Companion to drive the engine, using voice, grounded on the real API surface.

  1. Shipped two engine CRs (held-commit affordance; conversational fidelity).
  2. Surface-coherence audit found the nav severed (two systems, one-way island).
  3. Operator reframed: design the Companion against the engine's real capabilities, not the pages.
  4. Grounded on the live 204-operation API; produced the comprehensive Companion design.
  5. Built four surface mockups (two levels × two form factors).
  6. Blocked on the home — couldn't design it without engagement identity. Deep detour → identity record.
  7. Returned, finished the home mockups, reconciled all four to the identity vocabulary.
  8. Confirmed the Bin-3 gaps → the cost-sorted build queue.

Methodology lesson: the good design came from stepping back from feature-patching to ask "is the whole surface right," and grounding every structural claim against the live engine via CC rather than memory/screenshots — which diverged from truth repeatedly this session.

What is SETTLED (decided, grounded, filed)

Engagement identity — filed substrate/loomworks-engagement-identity-record-v0_1, pushed (8d8fbe9)

The Companion design — filed earlier (confirm exact path with CC)

The Bin-3 build queue — filed this message (see pending)

The four surface mockups (illustrations, NOT specs)

Standalone HTML, brand inlined, in ~/Downloads/, staged for filing: home-desktop, home-mobile, surface-desktop (in-engagement), surface-mobile (in-engagement). Decisions embodied (illustration-level; CR details deferred):

PENDING — filing not yet confirmed

Filing instructions were given but confirmation may not have landed. At session start, confirm with CC what is on loomworks-record main and pushed:

  1. Bin-3 findings recordloomworks-companion-bin3-capability-findings-v0_1. Confirm filed + pushed.
  2. The four surface mockups — filed as a set beside the design doc; the two surface-* (in-engagement) ones were consistency-passed (overwrite prior copies, same v0_1). Confirm filed + pushed, and whether the pair overwrote or were new.
  3. Navigation-graph scoping noteloomworks-navigation-graph-scoping-note-v0_1 (Cluster A). Confirm filed + pushed.

If any are unfiled, files are in ~/Downloads/. CC files by explicit path, halts before push, reports SHA.

OPEN — not settled (future, not blocking)

The next action