Version. 0.1
Date. 2026-08-06
Author. Claude.ai (drafting session). Operator: Marvin Percival.
Executed by. Claude Code on DUNIN7-M4, one session.
Target. /Users/dunin7/loomworks-engine and /Users/dunin7/loomworks, both at main, both read-only. [EXECUTING SESSION: report both SHAs; this brief deliberately names none, because it is drafted at the end of a long working day and the record moved several times during it.]
Charter. standing-notes/dunin7-standing-authorization-charter-v0_1. R-5 inspection run.
Build-list items. B-32, B-35, B-36, B-37, B-38, B-44, B-47, B-52, B-53, B-54, B-55, B-56, B-57. Thirteen.
Grounding. standing-notes/dunin7-build-list — read the highest version present for each item's description. Six of the thirteen were found by using the deployed product on 2026-08-06 and are described from what was seen on screen, not from code.
Status. Read-only. Establishes ground for two change requests — one engine, one surface. Produces no fix and no change request.
Each is small enough that its own inspection, change request, filing and checkpoint cycle would cost more than the fix. Together they are perhaps two days. Separately they are thirteen round trips.
But small is a claim, and for most of these nobody has checked it. Two are diagnosed to the line. The rest are symptoms — six of them observed on screen this morning with no code read behind them at all.
So this inspection has one job: establish, for each, what it actually is and what fixing it actually costs — and say plainly which ones are not small, because those leave the sweep rather than enlarging it.
> The failure to avoid. A change request that absorbs an item which turned out to be large is how a two-day sweep becomes a week. Any item this inspection finds is bigger than described comes out and gets its own scoping.
Both repositories read-only. No fixes, no branches, no commits, no dependency changes.
Test and lint runs are permitted. No dev server unless an item genuinely requires observing behaviour, and then on spare ports with teardown.
No model call. [EXECUTING SESSION: if an item cannot be settled without one, report the cost and leave it unread.]
Database. playground_dev and playground_test are never touched. A throwaway is permitted; the engine's README carries the stand-up sequence.
A failure is a result.
State only what you have read or run, plus the disciplines at standing-notes/loomworks-standing-note-executable-document-versions — read the highest version present.
unread rather than closing a gap with a plausible reading.
B-53 — a render's sequence number never arrives. The number is assigned on every path and was backfilled onto old rows; the list query never selects the column, so the reader gets None from a key that was never fetched. Confirm the diagnosis still holds and report what the fix touches. And establish whether any test would have caught it — the answer is expected to be no, which is part of the fix.
B-54 — nothing requires that number to exist. The column is nullable and no migration tightened it; the only constraint prevents two rows sharing a number. Confirm, and report what tightening it would cost — whether any existing row would violate a NOT NULL, and whether that can be established without touching production.
B-35 — a missing key reports a crash. One error returns 500 where its siblings return 503. Report the exact mapping, the siblings' mapping, and whether any test exercises the unconfigured path.
B-37 — a failed shaping production looks identical to a running one. The database already links a shape to its job; only a way to read it is missing. Report what exposing it would touch — a field on an existing response, a new route, or something larger — and whether the surface would need to change too, since that would move the item across repositories.
Six of these were seen on screen and never read in code. Establish the cause of each before sizing it.
B-52 — an answer's sources vanish on reload. The answer survives; its sources do not. Establish where they live, why they do not persist, and whether the fix is surface-only.
B-44 — things with titles displaying as untitled. Seen in two places: a Shape's title empty on a walk, and every shape in the Shaping room reading Untitled shape. Establish whether these are one cause or two — the build list assumes one and nobody has checked.
B-57 — a screen that appears to argue with itself. The Manifestation room says the record has not changed and then shows two different version numbers. Both are correct — the flag tracks content, the numbers track a counter that moves for other reasons. Establish where the sentence is composed and whether a clause can be added without touching the flag's logic.
**B-55 — the screen says of its type without knowing what a type is. It displays whatever number arrives beside fixed words. Establish whether the wire shape could carry the type at all**, and report the cost — this may be larger than it looks, and if so it leaves the sweep.
B-56 — a development sign-in on the live perimeter. It refuses correctly and nothing is exposed, but it offers something it cannot do. Establish what /auth is, whether anything depends on it, and whether it can simply not render in production.
B-38 — one room still uses its own state handling. RenderingRoom derives its own states where three rooms use the shared contract. Report how many call sites change and whether any behaviour would differ, not only that it is possible.
B-36 — no way to retire a render. The engine's route exists and is operator-driven. Establish what the control needs, and specifically whether retiring is reversible — an irreversible action needs a different treatment from a reversible one.
B-47 — credentials can only be issued through the interface. The whole pathway exists in the engine; no screen was built, deliberately. Establish what the screen needs, and flag if it turns out to be a form with real consequences rather than a button.
B-32 — no way to rebuild a summary the record has moved past. The screen tells you the record has moved and offers nothing. Establish what re-deriving costs — the earlier scoping said it spends credits, and an action that spends is a different item from one that does not.
For each of the thirteen, one line: is this small?
Small means: one or two files, no design decision, no new mechanism, and a fix a session can complete and verify without another inspection.
Report each as small, or not small and why. [EXECUTING SESSION: this is the finding, not a formality. The sweep exists because thirteen small items are cheaper together than apart; an item that is not small makes the group more expensive, not less. Say so.]
And report the natural split: which belong to the engine change request, which to the surface one, and whether any item spans both — B-37 and B-44 are the candidates.
playground_dev or playground_test.
One findings document, Markdown primary. No HTML companion — the record's convention for inspection briefs and findings is consistently bare. (standing-notes/loomworks-standing-note-html-companion-convention-v0_1.)
Path. inspection-briefs/loomworks-small-work-sweep-step-0-findings-v0_1.md. Copy to ~/Downloads.
Structure: environment (both SHAs, both tree states, which databases, whether any model call was made) · §6's answer first — the small-or-not list for all thirteen, and the split · then each item in the brief's order, with its cause anchored · corrections preserved · unread.
Filing. Charter R-1: commit and push on clean pre-flight. Append the outcome to current-status/dunin7-status-brief.
Small-work sweep Step 0 inspection. Read-only.
Brief: loomworks-record/inspection-briefs/loomworks-small-work-sweep-step-0-inspection-brief-v0_1.md
Confirm it exists, and that it is the highest version present — numeric sort.
Read the brief in full. Charter dunin7-standing-authorization-charter-v0_1 governs.
Two repositories, both at main, both READ-ONLY. The brief names no SHAs
deliberately — report both.
Read the highest present version of the build list for each item's description.
Six of the thirteen were described from what was seen on screen, not from code.
No fixes, no branches, no commits, no dependency changes, no model call.
playground_dev and playground_test are live databases and neither is touched.
Answer Section 6 FIRST: for each of the thirteen, is it small — one or two files,
no design decision, no new mechanism? An item that is not small comes OUT of the
sweep rather than enlarging it. Say which and why.
File findings per section 8. Append the outcome to the status brief.
DUNIN7 — Done In Seven LLC — Miami, Florida Loomworks — small-work sweep Step 0 inspection brief — v0.1 — 2026-08-06 Thirteen items called small. Two are diagnosed. For the rest, nobody has checked.