Version. 0.1
Date. 2026-08-01
Author. Claude.ai (drafting session). Operator: Marvin Percival.
Executed by. Claude Code on DUNIN7-M4, one session.
Target. /Users/dunin7/loomworks at main 7e81e30, tag manifestation-room-v0_1 — post-B-5.
Charter. standing-notes/dunin7-standing-authorization-charter-v0_1. R-5 inspection run.
Build-list items. B-6 (the Shaping screen), B-7 (the Rendering flow end to end), B-28 (contributed documents lost on the way out).
Status. Read-only. Establishes ground for change request C. Produces no code change and no change request.
Why now. B-5 merged, which unblocks both rooms. And B-5 changed the ground under them: CR-2026-160 modified usePagedList — the hook every room fetches through — added the ReadState contract, and threaded refreshNonce into RenderingRoom. Anything read about these rooms before 2026-08-01 is stale. B-25's Step 0 walked into exactly this trap on the engine side; this brief exists partly so the surface side does not.
Grounding. inspection-briefs/loomworks-operator-layer-cr-a-step-0-findings-v0_1 (the shared layer, the wall, the room shapes — read pre-B-5, so verify rather than inherit); scoping-notes/loomworks-completion-scoping-note-v0_2 (the governing rule); candidate-seeds/loomworks/loomworks-candidate-seed-v0_12 (Shaping, Rendering Modes A and B, Operator authority, only-show-what-is-available).
Read-only. No fixes, no branches, no commits, no npm install.
No dev server, no build, no test run. Every question here is decidable from source. If one is not, report it unread.
Engine source may be read at main a6a3ed6, read-only. CR-2026-161 is merged and tagged authorship-truth-v0_1, so there is no branch caveat — main carries the finished work. Do not run the engine and make no perimeter call.
No database. playground_dev is the live production database.
State only what you have read back, plus the disciplines at standing-notes/loomworks-standing-note-executable-document-versions-v0_4:
unread rather than closing a gap with a plausible reading.7e81e30 or reported as unverified.The claim on record. The system advertises that it accepts Markdown documents, refuses them on the way back out, and the contribution is lost rather than merely unreported. That last part is what makes it B-28 rather than a cosmetic bug, and it has never been located.
Establish the whole path, end to end, naming each hop:
This is the question that decides B-28's shape. A refusal before persistence is a validation fix. A refusal after persistence is a data-loss fix and a different change request.
Everything below was true before CR-2026-160 and must be re-established.
4.1 The room today. Read RenderingRoom.tsx in full at 7e81e30. What it fetches, through what layer, and whether it now uses ReadState or still derives its own states. CR-2026-160 adopted the contract where it already touched things; report which rooms are on it and which are not.
4.2 refreshNonce. CR-2026-160 threaded it into this room's reset key. Confirm it landed and that a conversation-side event can now refresh the room.
4.3 The download path. B-7 says there is none. Establish what exists: does any route, adapter or component fetch a render's content for download? Does the engine serve one — check its source at a6a3ed6 — and if it does, does the surface reach it?
4.4 Currency and supersession. B-7's second half: when an older and a newer render sit side by side, nothing says which is current.
Establish what the engine already expresses — a state field, a version, a supersession marker, a timestamp — and what the surface currently displays. The gap between those two is the finding. (The engine side of this was never inspected; the Manifestation equivalent turned out to be a wire rather than a build, so check before assuming a build is needed.)
The room is a placeholder. CR-2026-160 corrected its two strings so they assert the surface rather than the record, and left the room itself alone.
5.1 What the engine serves. Read the engine's shape-related routes at a6a3ed6. What exists for: listing shapes for an engagement, retrieving one, retrieving one at a version, and creating one? The Manifestation room needed no engine work; establish whether Shaping is the same.
5.2 The declared shape-types. The seed declares shape-types and maps them to render-types. Establish whether the engine enforces that mapping, exposes it, or neither — and whether the surface would have to carry it.
5.3 The strings as they now stand. Read the two corrected Shaping strings verbatim. They will be replaced when the room is built; report them so the replacement is a deliberate act rather than an overwrite.
Established at CR-2026-160 and to be re-confirmed: the vocabulary wall is a case-sensitive substring scan over src/, run as a Vitest test. Capitalised nouns are free; lowercase tokens are forbidden outside lib/room-labels.ts.
Establish for the two rooms this CR builds:
reshaping contains shaping; rendering may collide with React vocabulary that appears throughout a frontend. Report every collision a new component would plausibly hit, because this is the difference between a clean build and a build that needs an exemption per file.WIRE_BOUNDARY_FILES list and the convention for adding to it.A specific trap worth naming. CR-2026-160's adapter path could not work because the wall matches import specifiers, so each consumer would have needed a whole-file exemption. Establish the naming that avoids the same problem for these two rooms before the change request specifies a path.
main. The engine is free — CR-2026-161 is closed — but this is an inspection and writes nothing there.project / engagement displacement — change request D, and the wall's forbidden list is its root.One findings document, Markdown primary.
Path. inspection-briefs/loomworks-cr-c-step-0-findings-v0_1.md. Copy to ~/Downloads.
Structure: environment (both repository SHAs, tree states, and an explicit statement that no server, build, test, database or perimeter call was made) · question one, the contribution path hop by hop, ending in lost before persistence or lost after · question two, four parts, each marked re-verified or unverified against the CR-A findings · question three · question four, with the collision list · corrections preserved · unread.
Filing. Charter R-1: commit and push on clean pre-flight. Append the outcome to current-status/dunin7-status-brief.
Change request C Step 0 inspection. Read-only.
Brief: loomworks-record/inspection-briefs/loomworks-cr-c-step-0-inspection-brief-v0_1.md
Confirm it is the highest version present — numeric sort. Confirm it exists before
running any check against it.
Read the brief in full. Charter dunin7-standing-authorization-charter-v0_1 governs.
Target: /Users/dunin7/loomworks at main 7e81e30 — POST-B-5. CR-2026-160 changed
the shared hook every room fetches through, so anything the CR-A findings say
about these rooms was read before that merge. Re-verify or report unverified.
Engine source may be READ at main a6a3ed6 only. CR-2026-161 is merged, so there
is no branch to avoid — do not run the engine, make no perimeter call.
Read-only: no fixes, no branches, no commits, no npm install, no dev server, no
build, no test run, no database. playground_dev is the live production database.
Four questions in the brief's order. Question one decides whether B-28 is a
validation fix or a data-loss fix — establish where the contribution is at the
moment of refusal, not merely that it is refused.
File findings per section 8. Append the outcome to the status brief.
DUNIN7 — Done In Seven LLC — Miami, Florida Loomworks — change request C Step 0 inspection brief — v0.1 — 2026-08-01 Two rooms and a lost document. Read them where they are now, not where they were last week.